Great start to the third week of BWI, by completely missing it!
So Jess and I show up to Caledonian University ready to go, and decide to have a gander at the timetable to see which room we're in (I have a really bad memory). At this moment we forgot to realise our timetables were printed wrong at the start, and we had an old class listed for Monday, instead of the new class which we were trying to attend on THURSDAY. Bloody brilliant work from 3rd students.
Currently looking over the powerpoint just now on Blackboard.
It's pretty interesting, Wiki this and that is everywhere, it's became such a major part of internet life that I never actually sat down and thought "what the hell is a wiki!?"
- nor did I realise it was of such important use to business. My only real encounter with wiki's is of course Wikipedia and fan databases set up for fictional creations (Lost, Buffy, Spider-Man etc.)
I got to give good credit to the youtube video provided, the camping analogy makes it extremely easy to understand and is a bit of fun in the process.
Going to move on to the extended reading material provided in Blackboard to get fully caught up, hate the feeling of being behind...
On that note I guess I better get in touch with my two group mates and sort out our next E Activity!
Who will be the nucleus?
Thursday, 3 February 2011
Wednesday, 2 February 2011
WEEK 2, TASK 1 : Business Blogs
Been searching around the business blogs as required, varying in quality from each one.
I came across 4 Blogs that were notable for comparison and had features I both enjoyed and disliked.
Google Blog
http://googleblog.blogspot.com/search?updated-max=2011-01-26T10:17:00-08:00&max-results=10
Google's Blog was interesting as it gave information on more obscure aspects of the company (Holocaust Memorial, Art Gallery stuff) aswell as the usual promoting use a blog can give to customers. I first noticed the use of direct speech to the reader (using "you") which gave the blog a personal and one on one feel to it, making it very much a personal blog rather than just a news stream on the site.
It also provided pictures and video content to keep it interesting and had answers to questions in order to keep consumers informed on certain issues. The most notable post was a comparison with Microsoft's Bing as the blog flat out accused them of stealing Google's search results. This gave some interesting behind-the-scenes likeness to it and could only be read on a blog.
Blockbuster
http://blog.blockbuster.co.uk/page/2/
A blog close to my heart, and by heart, I mean my wallet. I was disappointed to see that Blockbuster's blog was very by the book and perhaps expected of a big business. promoting deals and giving information on new releases with little personality from the blogger. There was the odd "top 10" lists and "year in movies" but no real in depth look at the industry. It had pictures and videos that only gave the illusion of interest. These were mostly trailers and advertisements.
The overall look of the blog was unimpressive and rather dull. I wouldn't return to the blog as it's so impersonal and more like an advertising robot. The information it provides I could get better elsewhere, or just be searching new releases on Blockbuster's site.
Marvel
http://fans.marvel.com/go/universe/help
Their blog appeared to be great in concept. A whole section dedicated to writers, artists and staff's personal blogs? Count me in! Does it work? Sadly no.
The page for the blogs only displays recent posts and has no search function, no list of bloggers, nothing. It's very unintuitive and limiting in what you can look at.
From the recent ones I clicked for a blog post from the online editor of Marvel.
The style is extremely personal and a good read, as it isn't just promoting product. It provides insight to the industry, and can be very witty, great for fans of Marvel.
I imagine the rest of them would be like this, especially from writers and artists, but as I have to search through backlogs of recent posts, I couldn't be bothered trying! This of course is a very bad sign.
Overall, I'd say my least favourite was Marvel, purely on the principle that I can't find my favourite artist and writer's blog and have to rummage through random posts from hundreds of blog posts. It provides the best insight, has comment boxes and promotes interaction and a treat for fans, but when you can't find anything, it's a real pain. But oddly it has the potential to be the most innovative, promoting a huge spectrum of blogging from numerous sources and opinions, if only they fixed the user interface.
Blockbuster's is technically the worst due to it's no real personification and it being just a vehicle of obvious promotion, but Marvel is the biggest disappointment.
I came across 4 Blogs that were notable for comparison and had features I both enjoyed and disliked.
Google Blog
http://googleblog.blogspot.com/search?updated-max=2011-01-26T10:17:00-08:00&max-results=10
Google's Blog was interesting as it gave information on more obscure aspects of the company (Holocaust Memorial, Art Gallery stuff) aswell as the usual promoting use a blog can give to customers. I first noticed the use of direct speech to the reader (using "you") which gave the blog a personal and one on one feel to it, making it very much a personal blog rather than just a news stream on the site.
It also provided pictures and video content to keep it interesting and had answers to questions in order to keep consumers informed on certain issues. The most notable post was a comparison with Microsoft's Bing as the blog flat out accused them of stealing Google's search results. This gave some interesting behind-the-scenes likeness to it and could only be read on a blog.
Blockbuster
http://blog.blockbuster.co.uk/page/2/
A blog close to my heart, and by heart, I mean my wallet. I was disappointed to see that Blockbuster's blog was very by the book and perhaps expected of a big business. promoting deals and giving information on new releases with little personality from the blogger. There was the odd "top 10" lists and "year in movies" but no real in depth look at the industry. It had pictures and videos that only gave the illusion of interest. These were mostly trailers and advertisements.
The overall look of the blog was unimpressive and rather dull. I wouldn't return to the blog as it's so impersonal and more like an advertising robot. The information it provides I could get better elsewhere, or just be searching new releases on Blockbuster's site.
Marvel
http://fans.marvel.com/go/universe/help
Their blog appeared to be great in concept. A whole section dedicated to writers, artists and staff's personal blogs? Count me in! Does it work? Sadly no.
The page for the blogs only displays recent posts and has no search function, no list of bloggers, nothing. It's very unintuitive and limiting in what you can look at.
From the recent ones I clicked for a blog post from the online editor of Marvel.
The style is extremely personal and a good read, as it isn't just promoting product. It provides insight to the industry, and can be very witty, great for fans of Marvel.
I imagine the rest of them would be like this, especially from writers and artists, but as I have to search through backlogs of recent posts, I couldn't be bothered trying! This of course is a very bad sign.
Overall, I'd say my least favourite was Marvel, purely on the principle that I can't find my favourite artist and writer's blog and have to rummage through random posts from hundreds of blog posts. It provides the best insight, has comment boxes and promotes interaction and a treat for fans, but when you can't find anything, it's a real pain. But oddly it has the potential to be the most innovative, promoting a huge spectrum of blogging from numerous sources and opinions, if only they fixed the user interface.
Blockbuster's is technically the worst due to it's no real personification and it being just a vehicle of obvious promotion, but Marvel is the biggest disappointment.
Sunday, 14 February 2010
Updates, cinema and busy busy! Oh and my comic.
So I've not typed into this lovely white little box surrounded by various tools and hit "publish post" in quite some time. It's becuase I've been insanely busy - college work, work work (that's Blockbuster), comic work and actually being socialable with friends and such. I know, weird...
So here I am for the first time in ages! I missed you blogworld, but maybe I'd use Blogspot more if they didn't have a user interface as friendly as a recently
So here I am for the first time in ages! I missed you blogworld, but maybe I'd use Blogspot more if they didn't have a user interface as friendly as a recently
Wednesday, 18 November 2009
Clydebank College is Jack Bauer and the Man Flu.
There’s nothing like a big shit bomb to really brighten up your day when you’re already struck down by Man Flu. Yesterday Clydebank College was nice enough to send me a letter reminding me I have yet to pay for my course fees. It turns out even though I chose the “2 year option” on SAAS’s website last year; I still have to refill their tedious forms again this year!
I of course didn’t know this, as having an option to choose 2 years, to me, seems like a good reason to think you are covered for both.
Okay so I made a mistake and I’m far from an innocent party. I admit that and in a way it’s my own fault. But why o’ why do I get this stern letter about lack of payment 4 DAYS before I’ll be billed personally!?
It’s like the letters are jumping from the page, gripping you by your throat demanding a payment before the ever more suspenseful approaching deadline. Why did Clydebank College wait so long to finally tell me I made this error? Why days before an ominous deadline, which may result in me personally having to pay £1,300? Are they a fan of Jack Bauer and felt a nerve dreading race against the clock would be much better than advance notice?
I phoned up and now I have to speak with an advisor tomorrow with regards about getting my SAAS application “fast tracked” through their backdated system. Fellow students of mine tell me of how SAAS can be - as some of them were in near starvation before SAAS coughed up their loan.
On the good side my severe case of man flu is rapidly fading with each punch of the key. I was in work tonight, shovelling the usual Hollywood garbage to customers in [CENSORED DUE TO STORE POLICY] and while I thought I’d be sputtering and shuffling like a zombie I was surprisingly fresher than expected. So whoop, it’s away.
Two fucking days too late. Two days off college means two assessments missed and I still have to edit 6 minutes of video footage for next week - as well as write up the accompanying paper work - which teaching shaman Disco Dave conjured up for us the second last week before we finish.
Finding out new crucial information close to deadlines? It rings a very obvious deafening bell.
I of course didn’t know this, as having an option to choose 2 years, to me, seems like a good reason to think you are covered for both.
Okay so I made a mistake and I’m far from an innocent party. I admit that and in a way it’s my own fault. But why o’ why do I get this stern letter about lack of payment 4 DAYS before I’ll be billed personally!?
It’s like the letters are jumping from the page, gripping you by your throat demanding a payment before the ever more suspenseful approaching deadline. Why did Clydebank College wait so long to finally tell me I made this error? Why days before an ominous deadline, which may result in me personally having to pay £1,300? Are they a fan of Jack Bauer and felt a nerve dreading race against the clock would be much better than advance notice?
I phoned up and now I have to speak with an advisor tomorrow with regards about getting my SAAS application “fast tracked” through their backdated system. Fellow students of mine tell me of how SAAS can be - as some of them were in near starvation before SAAS coughed up their loan.
On the good side my severe case of man flu is rapidly fading with each punch of the key. I was in work tonight, shovelling the usual Hollywood garbage to customers in [CENSORED DUE TO STORE POLICY] and while I thought I’d be sputtering and shuffling like a zombie I was surprisingly fresher than expected. So whoop, it’s away.
Two fucking days too late. Two days off college means two assessments missed and I still have to edit 6 minutes of video footage for next week - as well as write up the accompanying paper work - which teaching shaman Disco Dave conjured up for us the second last week before we finish.
Finding out new crucial information close to deadlines? It rings a very obvious deafening bell.
Wednesday, 4 November 2009
Anti game-blame article I did a while back for college.
Video gaming will be forever etched into our society and culture for many more years to come; but will it be for the good? After all, video games make us fat, make us violent, make us addicts and destroy social lives. Well according to the media anyway. Cases from death and murder to exhaustion and obesity have all been linked to video games in the mass media. But what is the truth about Video games? How well do they fit in today’s society and the most important question of them all… Are they welcome?
A history of Violence
In April 1999, Columbine High School was the centre of a horrible tragedy that shook America. Two young males, Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold, age 18 and 17, stormed into school one morning bearing guns. They murdered 12 students, a teacher and injured 23 others before killing themselves in the library. This act of inhume brutality was the first time video games were put under the spotlight. Along with movies and musicians such as Marilyn Manson, video games were under scrutiny for their portrayal of violence and how they may have contributed to the killers mindset and motivation. After all, it was widely publicised that the both shooters were fans of a popular shooting game called “Doom” and that the massacre they would commit would be “just like Doom”. A lawsuit was filed against the publishers of the game ID but was unsuccessful. Motivations regarding social issues were brought up during the investigations. Both killers were outcasts and frequently bullied by the “jocks” of school. Given the established motivation of the killers, can video games still be held accountable? Graeme Kennedy - a post graduate student of the industry believes that video games do not cause people to be violent. He states “I don’t think games cause violent behaviour. I have seen studies which suggest video games can actually reduce stress”.
From Columbine onwards, video games have been popping up in the news relating to various murders and crimes.
In 2001 a 16 year old in America blamed his obsession with Grand Theft Auto 3 during court while on trail for murder. In 2003 an 18 year old killed two cops and claimed that another Grand Theft Auto game caused him to do it. These two cases, along with many other similar examples, in the end excluded video games in court.
The media, of course latched onto this aspect each and every time a crime reared it’s ugly head. Video games would be stigmatised over and over again.
Graeme Kennedy says “I think it is a step to far to blame on particular game for a persons actions. The media is too quick to use video games as a scapegoat, it does nothing to identify or solve the real problems.”
Graeme is right. The media - and especially within the USA - continued to emphasis the terrible effects on our society by violent video games. In America, this claim is in fact far from the truth.
The Department of Justice and Bureau of statistics in America have recorded that violent behaviour amongst young people is in fact at an all time low. Coincidently or not, their flow chart displays youth crime decreasing significantly from 1999 onwards. 1999 was of course the release of one of the biggest selling game console - The Playstation one. Another report from the FBI in 2004 claimed that violent behaviour dropped even further (by 2.2% since 2003) and hit an all time low on record. Another coincidence, if one believes so, is that the release of the biggest selling PS2 game was released. The very violent and controversial fourth instalment of the Grand Theft Auto series, Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas. Grand Theft Auto was always a media favourite for attack, surely a game so corrupt couldn’t be played by the most un-violent youth in history?
Digital Junkies
Added to the accusation of being violence mad, video games have also been linked to addiction. In September 2007, a man in China died after playing Internet video games for three consecutive days in an Internet café. The game was the ever expanding popular role playing game World Of Warcraft, which sees millions of players engaging each other online. There are other similar cases, some involving deaths as well.
In response to such incidents there have been established clinics to cope with video game addiction around the world. Are they necessary, and is it a major problem?
Graeme notes “I think some video games can be very addictive, They are designed to engage the player to continue giving it a go.”
The case examples are very rare and do not apply to most people. When questioned on his gaming habits Graeme had this to say - “I play videogames regularly, about 2 to 3 times a week. But I have never had any problems separating my gaming time from my work or social life.”
Graeme also adds on the subject “It is no worse than being addicted to a favourite sport. Only when taken to extremes it is negative”.
The good, the healthy and the educational
A strange concept amongst the ravaging bad press on video games is the many benefit’s the medium has. Graeme observes “Video games can reduce stress, increase reaction times and improve concentration”. As many games incorporate puzzle solving tasks, frequent challenges to overcome and encourages strategic thinking in order to complete; they can has positive educational outcomes in which the player still has fun. More recently the Nintendo Wii has released many self-benefiting products including the Wii Fit which is essentially an interactive work out game that can contribute greatly towards healthy exercise.
Games nowadays can also be considered works of art like music, movies and books. Games such as Metal Gear Solid 4 have in-depth plots and developed characters with emotional attachment that can be seen in other types of fiction. The Metal Gear Solid series also has important themes on war, weapons technology and the nature of humanity.
So video games can be highly entertaining, educational, stress reducing and can now be played socially with family and friends, thanks to party games such as Buzz! Quiz and the Nintendo Wii.
Video game mythology, icons and characters are world wide recognised by the public, the market continues to grow and is speculated to thrive even in times of the glooming credit crunch. Not bad at all.
Video games fit nicely into out modern culture and they contribute hugely to it. Are they welcome? Hell yes they are.
A history of Violence
In April 1999, Columbine High School was the centre of a horrible tragedy that shook America. Two young males, Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold, age 18 and 17, stormed into school one morning bearing guns. They murdered 12 students, a teacher and injured 23 others before killing themselves in the library. This act of inhume brutality was the first time video games were put under the spotlight. Along with movies and musicians such as Marilyn Manson, video games were under scrutiny for their portrayal of violence and how they may have contributed to the killers mindset and motivation. After all, it was widely publicised that the both shooters were fans of a popular shooting game called “Doom” and that the massacre they would commit would be “just like Doom”. A lawsuit was filed against the publishers of the game ID but was unsuccessful. Motivations regarding social issues were brought up during the investigations. Both killers were outcasts and frequently bullied by the “jocks” of school. Given the established motivation of the killers, can video games still be held accountable? Graeme Kennedy - a post graduate student of the industry believes that video games do not cause people to be violent. He states “I don’t think games cause violent behaviour. I have seen studies which suggest video games can actually reduce stress”.
From Columbine onwards, video games have been popping up in the news relating to various murders and crimes.
In 2001 a 16 year old in America blamed his obsession with Grand Theft Auto 3 during court while on trail for murder. In 2003 an 18 year old killed two cops and claimed that another Grand Theft Auto game caused him to do it. These two cases, along with many other similar examples, in the end excluded video games in court.
The media, of course latched onto this aspect each and every time a crime reared it’s ugly head. Video games would be stigmatised over and over again.
Graeme Kennedy says “I think it is a step to far to blame on particular game for a persons actions. The media is too quick to use video games as a scapegoat, it does nothing to identify or solve the real problems.”
Graeme is right. The media - and especially within the USA - continued to emphasis the terrible effects on our society by violent video games. In America, this claim is in fact far from the truth.
The Department of Justice and Bureau of statistics in America have recorded that violent behaviour amongst young people is in fact at an all time low. Coincidently or not, their flow chart displays youth crime decreasing significantly from 1999 onwards. 1999 was of course the release of one of the biggest selling game console - The Playstation one. Another report from the FBI in 2004 claimed that violent behaviour dropped even further (by 2.2% since 2003) and hit an all time low on record. Another coincidence, if one believes so, is that the release of the biggest selling PS2 game was released. The very violent and controversial fourth instalment of the Grand Theft Auto series, Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas. Grand Theft Auto was always a media favourite for attack, surely a game so corrupt couldn’t be played by the most un-violent youth in history?
Digital Junkies
Added to the accusation of being violence mad, video games have also been linked to addiction. In September 2007, a man in China died after playing Internet video games for three consecutive days in an Internet café. The game was the ever expanding popular role playing game World Of Warcraft, which sees millions of players engaging each other online. There are other similar cases, some involving deaths as well.
In response to such incidents there have been established clinics to cope with video game addiction around the world. Are they necessary, and is it a major problem?
Graeme notes “I think some video games can be very addictive, They are designed to engage the player to continue giving it a go.”
The case examples are very rare and do not apply to most people. When questioned on his gaming habits Graeme had this to say - “I play videogames regularly, about 2 to 3 times a week. But I have never had any problems separating my gaming time from my work or social life.”
Graeme also adds on the subject “It is no worse than being addicted to a favourite sport. Only when taken to extremes it is negative”.
The good, the healthy and the educational
A strange concept amongst the ravaging bad press on video games is the many benefit’s the medium has. Graeme observes “Video games can reduce stress, increase reaction times and improve concentration”. As many games incorporate puzzle solving tasks, frequent challenges to overcome and encourages strategic thinking in order to complete; they can has positive educational outcomes in which the player still has fun. More recently the Nintendo Wii has released many self-benefiting products including the Wii Fit which is essentially an interactive work out game that can contribute greatly towards healthy exercise.
Games nowadays can also be considered works of art like music, movies and books. Games such as Metal Gear Solid 4 have in-depth plots and developed characters with emotional attachment that can be seen in other types of fiction. The Metal Gear Solid series also has important themes on war, weapons technology and the nature of humanity.
So video games can be highly entertaining, educational, stress reducing and can now be played socially with family and friends, thanks to party games such as Buzz! Quiz and the Nintendo Wii.
Video game mythology, icons and characters are world wide recognised by the public, the market continues to grow and is speculated to thrive even in times of the glooming credit crunch. Not bad at all.
Video games fit nicely into out modern culture and they contribute hugely to it. Are they welcome? Hell yes they are.
Tuesday, 3 November 2009
FIlm round up. Reviews of films I have seen recently.
I intend (or intended), but I might still (or maybe not) use this blog as a means to review films and television shows. It is a good idea, especially for someone who is a bloody media student and has interest in that sort of thing. Well, I'll give it a crack, bit in a little less depth. I couldn't be bothered picking any particular film, so I'll bitch and/or praise away the most recent ones I've seen. If you like, let me know. If you hate, then that's my ambition down the toilet and you've crushed my dreams, dick.
Drag me to Hell
Sam Riami crawls out of the hell that was Spiderman 3 and delivers something better and less offensive. A straight forward, clicking-tock horror film that racks up the suspense and horror as a poor woman is literally being dragged to hell by a demon due to some old bats Gypsie curse.
I found it genuinely scary in bits, and positively repulsive in others. It's the usual Riami mix of extreme sillyness with terror. The cast give serviceable performances for the genre and the lead is likeable enough and not just because she's hot. Everything is scripted rather well, with some clever cinematography and editing to drive home its narrative.
Friday the 13th (remake)
Destroying a lineage of 500+ crappy films with another crappy film. Oh but it's new.
The film actually started on an oddly high note. The characters were strangely likeable and could muster up enough acting talent to actually make me believe in what I was watching. It had a bordenline arsty farsy cinematic technique with its use of music in one scene that made me think that it might actually be alright. Of course, lug-head Jason finally comes around to ripping them apart with his machete, and like his victims, the film is turned into a bloody mess.
The new and shiny main cast then take stage and are instantly begging to be slaughtered. I hate the movie but I love Jason! Kill those annoying shits.
There's nothing much else to say on this. It's the same old rubbish. Predictable formula, lame teen dialouge with lots of drugs and sex talk. No character development, okay filmmaking, okay this, bad script and the not so surprising twist of "oh wait, he's actually alive!" - Insulting.
Trick 'r Treat
Jees, all I've watched is horror recently and not cause it was Halloween! Subconscious is definetly at work here. damn you! - conscious mind
Trick r' Treat is an odd anthology of 4 intertwining tales that actually revolve around Halloween night. It isn't that scary, nor is it --
Okay if I do reviews I'm doing one film at a time here. I'm bored and it's time to play Uncharted.
Sorry media folks, if someone is here to give me a job based on my writing work on this blog, I'll still be happy knowing I was playing the PS3.
p.s Trick 'r Treat is weirdly entertaining despite the negative note I came to a crashing halt on.
Drag me to Hell
Sam Riami crawls out of the hell that was Spiderman 3 and delivers something better and less offensive. A straight forward, clicking-tock horror film that racks up the suspense and horror as a poor woman is literally being dragged to hell by a demon due to some old bats Gypsie curse.
I found it genuinely scary in bits, and positively repulsive in others. It's the usual Riami mix of extreme sillyness with terror. The cast give serviceable performances for the genre and the lead is likeable enough and not just because she's hot. Everything is scripted rather well, with some clever cinematography and editing to drive home its narrative.
Friday the 13th (remake)
Destroying a lineage of 500+ crappy films with another crappy film. Oh but it's new.
The film actually started on an oddly high note. The characters were strangely likeable and could muster up enough acting talent to actually make me believe in what I was watching. It had a bordenline arsty farsy cinematic technique with its use of music in one scene that made me think that it might actually be alright. Of course, lug-head Jason finally comes around to ripping them apart with his machete, and like his victims, the film is turned into a bloody mess.
The new and shiny main cast then take stage and are instantly begging to be slaughtered. I hate the movie but I love Jason! Kill those annoying shits.
There's nothing much else to say on this. It's the same old rubbish. Predictable formula, lame teen dialouge with lots of drugs and sex talk. No character development, okay filmmaking, okay this, bad script and the not so surprising twist of "oh wait, he's actually alive!" - Insulting.
Trick 'r Treat
Jees, all I've watched is horror recently and not cause it was Halloween! Subconscious is definetly at work here. damn you! - conscious mind
Trick r' Treat is an odd anthology of 4 intertwining tales that actually revolve around Halloween night. It isn't that scary, nor is it --
Okay if I do reviews I'm doing one film at a time here. I'm bored and it's time to play Uncharted.
Sorry media folks, if someone is here to give me a job based on my writing work on this blog, I'll still be happy knowing I was playing the PS3.
p.s Trick 'r Treat is weirdly entertaining despite the negative note I came to a crashing halt on.
Wednesday, 21 October 2009
I don’t care about your opinions; keep them private in public places
Despite being a student and arguably a snob when it comes to film, television or any art form; I find myself torn between two worlds. The artistic world; where I discuss symbolism, theme and metaphor, and then there’s my normal guy world. In normal guy world I hate the sound of people discussing theme and metaphor, be it cinema or novels. It is a grating sound that grips your brain in a thumping chokehold as media half-wits engage in a bloody war of words. Each over-baked stew of insight thrown into the ring against their fellow scarfed opponents comes out as attention seeking nonsense; in which they look into minute unimportant sequences to find some grand symbolism. As in, yes a film has this theme, but a close up of a man’s toe nail does not connate Communist oppression in Russia, dolts.
Not to say I don’t exam (and enjoy) in detail the craft of an author or director’s work, but finding meaning in something that is meaningless is top of the agenda of the fancy student body. My deepest worry, is when I’m in my art world, I sound like them. I hope I don’t, when I talk to “civvies” I always dumb down my artiste knowledge, as to not sound like them. And now I’m coming off that way just by writing this thing!
Perhaps worse is the artful-look-at-me-I-go-to-Uni suck up who drool over anyone who has any sort of artistic output. I was heading up Glasgow town the other day to purchase some new comics with my freshly earned doh, in which I took the delightful travel of the underground. A collection of 3 artistes stood about looking stereotypical when they caught attention to a young 30’s man with a shaved head. He walked past and responded to the attention to the guy artiste out of the two girls. It looked as though they would part instantly but a strange friendship bonded as he hung around with them and even got on the train! Now, he was a stranger, yes, but familiar; and the realisation bell hit me as I heard them talk. He’s some sort of art world celebrity.
I couldn’t figure him out, but he seemed oddly familiar in a mind trickery kind of way. The whole journey had them fawning over him like they wanted to bare his children, kiss his feet and plaster his kitchen. I heard them discuss a project with strained forced interest of “wow, you’re so awesome!” Our mysterious bald headed mini-celeb told about his current project that was about terrorism, to which the group collectively widened their eyes as if to say, “Wow so deep, like man, its like current!” Then Mr. Bald Celeb hit out with, “I mean, everyone is so scared about it just now, that something might happen.” Congratulations social commentator, you’ve hit a completely obvious insight in the head with a blunt 5 year old hammer. I really needed you to point out this enigma of a theme, and you proudly announcing it to your minions on the subway only solidifies the fact that you take a certain better-than-you self pride. Enjoy the smell of your own farts, sir. I know the pretentious noses of your peers will.
What is the theme of this little rant? C’mon arty fartsies, talk like that when in class or at the theatre. When in front of the real world, please don’t try to impress. You come off, simply, as douche bags.
If I’ve ever sounded like this, I’m done for!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Posts
